Research Integrity
The use of truthful and reliable methods when recommending, carrying out, and assessing research is referred to as research integrity. It entails publishing and administering research findings while paying close attention to guidelines and universally regarded professional standards. Research integrity offers neutrality and transparency. It depends on the integrity of the peer review.
Peer Review
Peer review has an impact on how scientists, researchers, and the common people perceive specific studies and the field of research. We rely on expert opinions to evaluate research before publication and assist in rectifying the record when errors are found.
There are policies that protect the integrity of the peer-review process. Such as:
- World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)
- Council of Publication Ethics (COPE)
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
If the peer review integrity is maintained, the research integrity can also be maintained to some extent. As the authors, peer reviewers, and editors are essential parts of the peer review process; they are all responsible for the integrity of the peer review.
Authors’ Contributions to Research Integrity
- Authors should abstain from fabricating information and incorporating them into their manuscripts. Data used in a manuscript should always be based on facts and findings.
- Altering research procedures or tools or modifying or erasing data or findings is not a true reflection of the research actually conducted.
- Any data provided by an author in a manuscript that belongs to someone else should be credited to them to avoid plagiarism.
- The financial support and financial interest in particular research should always be clearly disclosed by the author. In case there is no financial support of interest, some journals demand the author to state so.
- While suggesting potential reviewers, the authors should not mention people they are associated with in any way.
Peer Reviewers’ Contributions to Research Integrity
- Peer reviewers should know whether they are the right expert for a particular manuscript. They must inform the editor if they consider themselves incompetent.
- Reviewers are ethically not permitted to discuss manuscripts they are reviewing outside of the designated review process.
- The editor should be notified if a reviewer has any financial conflict of interest.
- Any comment added by a reviewer for revision should be factual and unaffected by professional or personal bias.
- The comments by a reviewer should be self-descriptive, precise, and productive for the authors to understand and make revisions to the manuscript.
Editors’ Contributions to Research Integrity
- Editors evaluate whether a manuscript matches the aims and scope of a journal.
- They warrant an impartial review process for every manuscript.
- Biases and misconducts are sorted out by editors as a governing body.
- Honest acceptance or rejection of a manuscript depends on the editors.
Conclusion
Research integrity demands cumulative effort and peer review is an important component of it. If you are interested in learning more about peer review, research integrity, and many such topics, please visit the link https://www.pubmanu.com. You can mail us at support@manuscriptedit.com for assistance. We will be happy to assist in your publication journey!
[credit-sonam]